From Dashboards to Standards: Introducing the AI Visibility 2.0 White Paper

Editorial Board – AIVO Journal
Yesterday, we argued that dashboards are not enough. “AI Visibility 1.0” tools—those that track “prompt volumes” or generate brand rankings from opaque datasets—may serve marketing curiosity, but they cannot support governance. Visibility in generative AI has become a fiduciary, reputational, and compliance issue. Dashboards cannot carry that weight.
Today we are publishing the AI Visibility 2.0 White Paper on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17169746).
The white paper defines AI Visibility 2.0 as a governance-grade framework for measuring and managing brand presence in AI-mediated discovery. Its five pillars are:
- Transparency – documented data provenance and sampling logic
- Reproducibility – metrics independently verifiable within tolerance bands
- Attestation – anonymization and methodology certified by third-party auditors
- Regulatory alignment – compliance with GDPR, CPRA, FTC guidance, and the EU AI Act
- Board-readiness – outputs structured for fiduciary reporting and ESG disclosures
The paper critiques the structural deficiencies of AI Visibility 1.0, maps regulatory requirements across jurisdictions, and provides practical tools:
- an anonymization attestation checklist
- a reproducibility test protocol
- a procurement clause that enterprises can adopt immediately
As proof of concept, the paper references the AIVO Standard v3.0 and the AIVO 100™ index, both of which show that transparent, reproducible, and attested visibility metrics are achievable in practice.
Our goal is not simply to add another layer of analysis. It is to establish a standard that boards, regulators, and investors can trust—moving the field decisively from dashboards to standards.
📖 Read and download the full white paper here: Zenodo DOI link